The bidder must be given the opportunity to provide evidence that they have taken sufficient and appropriate remedial action i.e. they have ‘self-cleansed’. If you are satisfied that the evidence provided is sufficient to demonstrate reliability, you should not exclude the bidder from the procurement procedure on those grounds

The bidder must satisfy that it has:

• paid, or undertaken to pay, compensation for any damage caused by the criminal offence or misconduct;
• provided detailed facts and circumstances by  collaborating with the investigating authorities; and
• taken appropriate concrete technical, organisational and personnel measures to prevent further criminal offences or misconduct.

In the case of tax and social security breaches, the bidder should not be excluded if they have fufilled their obligations by paying or entered into a biding agreed with the view to paying monies due or the obligation to repay otherwise ceases. 

When considering any self-cleansing measures, organisations must consider all relevant factors.  This includes the gravity and particular circumstances of the criminal offence or misconduct.

If you believe the bidder’s remedial action  is not sufficient to demonstrate reliability, you must provide the bidder with a statement outlining the reasons for the decision.  The statement of reasons must be provided in writing as soon as is reasonably practicable to allow the bidder to understand why the self-cleansing measures taken are insufficient.

Questions relating to the above exclusion grounds are contained in the SPD.  It is best practice, and will help promote consistency, to use the SPD document for all route 2 procurement exercises.

The standardised statement document has been developed to support you in explaining the exclusion criteria to bidders.  Within the standardised statement document is a standard paragraph of text that can be added to your contract notice in section II.2.14 (Additional Information) to explain the exclusion criteria.

Please note that if you use the online SPD module on PCS, there is no need to add information on the Exclusion Grounds to the Contract Notice as they are automatically added to the module.

Buyers must ask if a bidder has been convicted by final judgement of one of the criminal offences contained in the relevant regulations

This includes:

• Participation in a criminal organisation
• Corruption
• Bribery and Fraud
• Terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities
• Money laundering or terrorist financing
• Child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings
   

Buyers must ask if a bidder has taken part in Blacklisting activites. 

Blacklisting refers to the practice of systematically denying individuals employment, who would otherwise be able to be employed.  Blacklisting is done on the basis of information, accurate or not, held in some type of database. The Scottish Government regards blacklisting or the compiling of a blacklist as totally unacceptable.

The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 provide rights for individuals if blacklisting results in refusal of employment, detriment, dismissal or redundancy. 

The above are listed in regulations 8 and 9(1) of the Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016.

In exceptional circumstances you may disregard the mandatory exclusion grounds when selecting a bidder.  This can only be done where there are overriding reasons relating to the public interest. This provision is known as derogation from the mandatory exclusion considerations and ensures that organisations are able to respond to unforeseen emergency circumstances.

There is no definitive list of situations in which this derogation can be used and any decision should be made on a case by case basis. Organisations should be able to demonstrate that the actual or potential harm is so great, that the public interest in using the derogation outweighs the public interest in excluding a bidder.

An example may be where urgently needed vaccines or emergency equipment can only be purchased from a bidder to whom one of the mandatory exclusion grounds otherwise applies.

Each situation must be judged on its merits, but the following situations are, on their own, unlikely to meet this test:

• when a bidder which should be excluded is offering a substantially better quality / more economical product or service;
• when there would otherwise be a lack of competition.

Organisations may exclude a bidder where the bidder has breached its tax or social security obligations.  These may take the forms of judicial or administrative decision or other “appropriate means”.

Buyers can request the following examples of evidence to understand a bidder’s breach in tax or social security obligations:

• credit references, i.e. details of any outstanding tax debt;
• company accounts, depending on the size of the tax debt the bidder may be obliged to include this in their accounts;
• an admission by a bidder to an Occasion of Non-Compliance (OONC); or,
• an admission by a bidder of the failure of an avoidance scheme which they were involved in and was, or should have been, notified under Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Scheme (DOTAS).

In the case of tax and social security breaches, the bidder should not be excluded if they have fufilled their obligations by paying or entered into a biding agreed with the view to paying monies due or the obligation to repay otherwise ceases. 

Note – these examples relate to the UK tax regime, and there will be equivalents in other Member States which should be considered.

Bidders may be excluded if they have breached any the obligations in relation to environmental, social and labour law both in any relevant national and relevant collective agreements and specific international agreements.

Further information can be found in 9(5)(a) of The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016.

When determining whether to exclude a bidder on this basis, a contracting authority should be proportionate in its decision, taking into account the size of the contract, the relevance of the breach, and its impact on the operational and reputational risk to the delivery of the contract.

Where a bidder is bankrupt or subject to insolvency proceedings, you can choose whether to exclude them from the procurement exercise.

Potential evidence could include:

• copies of accounts verifying they have sufficient liquidity to perform contract
• its business plan outlining steps the potential supplier will take to address concerns, or
• references from other recent customers
• when considering whether to exclude such a bidder you should consider contract delivery potential risks, such as:
• the impact this may have on the sub-contracting supply chain.
• the scale of the contract
• potential consequences of the contract failing.

Additionally, organisations should take into account the potential benefits of awarding a contract to such a bidder. These can include:

• providing opportunities to contribute to increased employment in communities
• the wellbeing of local and regional communities 
• helping unlock the innovation or economic potential with local businesses.

Bidders may be excluded if they are guilty of grave professional misconduct, which renders its integrity questionable;

Further information can be found in 9(5)(c) of The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016.

When determining whether to exclude a bidder on this basis, a contracting authority should be proportionate in its decision, taking into account the size of the contract, the relevance of the breach, and its impact on the operational and reputational risk to the delivery of the contract.

Bidders may be excluded if a conflict of interest exists which may impact the procurement process.

Further information can be found in 9(5)(e) of The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016.

When determining whether to exclude a bidder on this basis, a contracting authority should be proportionate in its decision, taking into account the size of the contract, the relevance of the breach, and its impact on the operational and reputational risk to the delivery of the contract.

Bidders may be excluded if a distortion of competition may arise from the prior involvement of the bidder in the preparation of the tender.

Further information can be found in 9(5)(f) of The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016.

When determining whether to exclude a bidder on this basis, a contracting authority should be proportionate in its decision, taking into account the size of the contract, the relevance of the breach, and its impact on the operational and reputational risk to the delivery of the contract.

Bidders may be excluded if they have shown significant or persistent deficiencies in the performance of a substantive requirement (under a prior public contractor or a prior concession contract which led to early termination of that prior contract, damages or other comparable sanctions).

Further information can be found in The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016

When determining whether to exclude a bidder on this basis, a contracting authority should be proportionate in its decision, taking into account the size of the contract, the relevance of the breach, and its impact on the operational and reputational risk to the delivery of the contract.

Bidders may be excluded if they are found to have:

• seriously misrepresented the supply of information or have withheld information (when this information would be used to confirm there are no grounds for their exclusion from the procurement exercise, and therefore the bidder meets the selection criteria) OR

the bidder has:

• unduly influenced the decision making process
• obtained confidential information which may give them undue advantages in the procurement procedure
• negligently provided misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions

Further information can be found in The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016

You must consider how, in conducting your procurement, you can involve small and medium enterprises, third sector bodies and supported businesses.  This can include the use of sub-contractors to support the delivery of the contract.

The Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016 do not include applying mandatory and discretionary exclusion grounds to sub-contractors for contracts below the GPA Procurement Threshold contract value.  However you should consider the circumstances where this approach needs to be applied to safeguard effective contract delivery.

Exclusions grounds apply to a person who is:

• a member of the administrative, management or supervisory body of the bidder or
• has powers of representation, decision or control in relation to such bidder.

In the case of Care and Support Services the mandatory exclusion grounds Regulation 8(1) of the Procurement (Scotland) Regulations 2016 must be applied to all procurements, and you can also choose to apply the discretionary exclusion grounds.

Exclusion statements should be put under section II.2.14 Additional Information of the Social and other Specific Services Contract Notice.